نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار مرکز اسناد آسیا، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی
چکیده
روایات نبوی و نیز واقعیت‌های تاریخی را نقد می‌کنیم. انکار وصایت، دیدگاه کسانی است که معتقدند پیامبر اکرم، آگاهانه با امتناع از تعیین جانشین خود، آیندۀ امت را به صحابة خویش سپرد. از زاویه‌ای دیگر، بررسی وصایای خلفای اسلامی، نشان می‌دهد که اساس انتقال قدرت در تمامی خلافت‌های اموی و عباسی و عثمانی (جز در موارد استثنایی) بر پایة وصیت حاکم بوده است و به‌طور پیش‌فرض در این نظریه، تنها پیامبر اکرم (ص) است که از حقّ تعیین جانشین محروم شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Prophet’s Wills on Designating His Immediate Successor: A Criticism of the Thesis Denying the Prophet’s Choice Over His Successorship
نویسنده [English]
- Kamyar Sedaghatsamar Hosseini
Assistant Professor at the Center for Imam Ali Studies, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
چکیده [English]
The present paper introduces examples of Prophet Muhammad’s commands designating Imam Ali as his successor and criticizes the thesis which claims that the Prophet gave no commands or made no indications as to Imam Ali succeeding him. The paper shows the contradictions between this thesis and Islamic hadiths and reports, as well as with historical facts. Denying the Prophet’s choice over his successorship is a view held by those who argue that the Prophet deliberately refrained from designating a successor for himself to let his companions (sahabah) choose the future of the people. However, study of wills left by Islamic caliphs reveals that, with few exeptions, successors of caliphs were chosen based on the wills during Umayyad, Abbasid and Ottoman Caliphates. In this thesis, therefore, the Prophet is the only exception to having the right to choose his successor.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Keywords: Prophet Muhammad’s will
- Imam Ali
- Caliph of the Prophet
- Denying the Prophet’s choice over his successorship
)